“Well did you feel jealous…?” Control & Ideology in Police Interviews with Rape Complainants
Nicci Macleod (Aston University)
Volume 3, Issue 1
Abstract
The methods used by the UK Police to investigate complaints of rape have unsurprisingly come under much scrutiny in recent times, with a 2007 joint report on behalf of HM Crown Prosecution Service Inspectorate and HM Inspectorate of Constabulary concluding that there were many areas where improvements should be made. The research reported here forms part of a larger project which draws on various discourse analytical tools to identify the processes at work during police interviews with women reporting rape. Drawing on a corpus of video recorded police interviews with women reporting rape, this study applies a two pronged analysis to reveal the presence of these ideologies. Firstly, an analysis of the discourse markers ‘well' and ‘so' demonstrates the control exerted on the interaction by interviewing officers, as they attach importance to certain facts while omitting much of the information provided by the victim. Secondly, the interpretative repertoires relied upon by officers to ‘make sense' of victim's accounts are subject to scrutiny.
As well as providing micro-level analyses which demonstrate processes of interactional control at the local level, the findings of these analyses can be shown to relate to a wider context - specifically prevailing ideologies about sexual violence in society as a whole.
Download
Download full text of the article as PDF
References
Amnesty International UK (2005) Sexual Assault Research Summary Report http://www.amnesty.org.uk/uploads/documents/doc_16619.doc, accessed 30/01/2006.
Burt, M. R. (1980) Cultural myths and supports for rape. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 38: 217-230.
Coates, L., Beavin Bavelas, J., and Gibson, J. (1994) Anomalous language in sexual assault trial judgements. Discourse & Society 5 (2): 189-206.
Edward, K.E, and MacLeod, M. (1999) The reality and myth of rape: Implications for the criminal justice system. Expert Evidence 7 (1): 37-58
Ehrlich, S. (2001) Representing Rape: Language and Sexual Consent. London: Routledge.
Estrich, S. (1987) Real Rape. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Fielding, N. (1994) Cop canteen culture. In T.A. Newburn and E.A. Stanko (eds.), Just Boys Doing Business?: Men, Masculinities and Crime. London: Routledge. pp. 46-63.
HMCPSI /HMIC (2007) Without Consent: Thematic Report. inspectorates.homeoffice.gov.uk/hmic/inspections/thematic/wc-thematic/them07-wc.pdf , accessed 20/08/2007.
Johnson, A. (2002) So...?: Pragmatic implications of so-prefaced questions in formal police interviews. In J. Cotterill (ed.), Language in the Legal Process. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan. pp. 91-110.
Kelly, L., Lovett, J. and Regan, L. (2005) A Gap or a Chasm? Attrition in Reported Rape Cases: Home Office Research Study. 293. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs05/hors293.pdf, accessed 20/01/2006.
Kershaw, C., Nicholas,S. and Walker, A. (2008) Crime in England and Wales 2007/08: Findings from the British Crime Survey and police recorded crime. Home Office Statistical Bulletin. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs08/hosb0708.pdf Accessed 04/08.
Matoesian, G. M. (1993) Reproducing Rape: Domination through Talk in the Courtroom Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Myhill, A. and Allen, J. (2002) Rape and sexual assault of women: Findings from the British Crime Survey. http://www.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs2/r159.pdf , accessed 13/02/2006.
Page, A. D. (2008) Judging women and defining crime: Police officers' attitudes toward women and rape. Sociological Spectrum 28 (4): 389-411.
Pomerantz, A. (1984) Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J.H. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds.), Structures of Social Action: Studies in Conversation Analysis Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 57-101.
RASASC: Rape & Sexual Abuse Support Centre, North West Wales (2008) Annual Report (Unpublished).
Schiffrin, D. (1987) Discourse Markers Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
van Dijk, T. (2001) Multidisciplinary CDA: A plea for diversity. In R. Wodak and M. Meyer (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis London: Sage. pp. 95-120.
Wetherell, M. and Potter, J. (1988) Discourse Analysis and the identification of interpretative repertoires. In C. Antaki (ed.), Analysing Everyday Explanation. London: Sage pp. pp. 168-183.
Wodak, R. (1996) Disorders of Discourse. London: Longman.