The Human Face of the European Union: A Critical Study

 Giuditta Caliendo (University of Naples Federico II) and Elena Magistro University of London Royal Holloway)

Volume 3, Issue 2

Abstract

Recent studies on the informative material made available to the general public by the European Union (Caliendo 2007, forthcoming in coll. with Piga; Magistro 2007a, 2007b, forthcoming) have shown that the community institutions and bodies notably draw from a variety of different genres and discursive practices to appeal to their audience. More specifically, the European Union (EU) benefits from orders of discourse that are generally found in communication in the commodity sector. The spread of consumer culture has affected the way public entities present and manage themselves, leading to a more commercial approach in terms of the objects they deal with (i.e. public products), the beneficiaries of these objects (i.e. customers), and the way public entities represent these objects and address such beneficiaries (i.e. the adoption of a promotional style). Hence, the public sector has lately been experiencing a process of commodification of social life, carrying elements of marketisation of public and institutional discourse (Fairclough and Wodak 1997).

Albeit critical research focusing specifically on EU informative documents is still at an early stage, the above-mentioned trends have been documented under many respects, looking at revealing instances of lexicon and grammar, as well as larger-scale discursive and visual elements. This paper intends to broaden investigations on the strategies and genres adopted by the EU to win consensus and promote its institutional structure. Attention is called to alternative tools supplementing the array of discursive devices and structures employed in EU brochures of comparable nature. In particular, focus will be placed on the ‘humanisation' of the European Union, achieved by means of the incorporation of EU employees' profiles in the Union's informative material. The attribution of precise names, faces, roles and objectives to activity carried out at the European Union will be examined along with the social impact of such attribution discussed within the framework of critical discourse analysis.

Download

Download full text of the article as PDF

References

Bourdieu, P. (1986) Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste. Cambridge: Polity.

Caliendo, G.  and Napolitano, A. (2008) Communities, boundaries and new neighbours: The discursive construction of EU enlargement.  Journal of Contemporary European Research 4 (4), Special Issue - Media and Communication in Europe: Babel Revisited: 322-345.

Caliendo, G. (2007) The Role of the New Media in the Promotion of Identity Frameworks.  In M. Bait and M.C. Paganoni (eds.), Discourse and Identity in Specialized Communication. Conference Proceedings. Milano: Lubrina Editore, 32-35.

Caliendo, G. and Piga, A. (forthcoming) Framing identity through the virtual channels of institutional communication.  In P. Evangelisti and E. Ventola (eds.), Issues of Identity in and Across Cultures and Professional Worlds.  Bern: Peter Lang. 

Cap, P. (2005) Language and legitimization: Developments in the proximization model of political discourse analysis.  Lodz Papers in Pragmatics 1: 7-36.

Chilton, P. (2004) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice.  London: Routledge.

Chouliaraki, L. and Fairclough, N. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis.  Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Chilton, P. and Schäffner C. (1997) Discourse and politics.  In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction.  Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction.  Vol. 2.  London: Sage.  pp. 206-230.

Fairclough, N. (1995) Media Discourse.  London: Edward Arnold.

Fairclough, N. and Chouliaraki, L. (1999) Discourse in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis.  Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.

Fairclough, N. and Wodak, R. (1997) Critical discourse analysis.  In T.A. van Dijk (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction.  Discourse Studies: A Multidisciplinary Introduction.  Vol. 2.  London: Sage.  pp. 258-284.

Magistro, E. (2007a) Promoting the European identity: Politeness strategies in the discourse of the European Union.  Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 1 (1): 51-73.

Magistro, E. (2007b) A constitution for Europe: Elements of politeness in informative brochures on the European Constitution.  Paper presented at the Third International Symposium on Politeness. Leeds: University of Leeds.

Magistro, E. (forthcoming) The marketization of institutional discourse: The case of the European Union.  In U. Okulska and P. Cap (eds.), Current Directions in Political Discourse Analysis: Methodological and Critical Perspectives.  Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

Rutherford, P. (2000) Endless Propaganda. The Advertising of Public Goods.  Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Van Leeuwen, T.  (1996) The representation of social actors.  In C.R. Caldas-Coulthard and M. Coulthard (eds.), Texts and Practices: Readings in Critical Discourse Analysis.  London: Routledge.  pp. 32-70.

Van Leeuwen, T. (2005) Three models of interdisciplinarity. In R. Wodak and P. Chilton (eds.), New Agenda in (Critical) Discourse Analysis: Theory, Methodology and Interdisciplinarity.  Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  pp. 3-18.

Van Leeuwen, T. and Wodak R. (1999) Legitimizing immigration control: A discourse-historical analysis.  Discourse Studies 1: 83-119.

Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M. and Liebhart, K. (1999) The Discursive Construction of National Identity.  Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.