From the Discourse BookstoreLatest news/announcementsUser login |
Todolí (2007) Disease Metaphors in Urban PlanningDisease Metaphors in Urban PlanningJúlia Todolí, University of ValènciaVolume 1AbstractIt is widely assumed that metaphor is a salient
feature of discourse, with a two-fold function.
Firstly, it helps make complex issues understandable to the public, and
secondly, it helps promote and legitimize the ideological viewpoints of
particular groups. The main aim of this
paper is to look into the Plan for Restoring the Islamic Wall in Barri del
Carme (València, 2002) to show how the authors of the plan use metaphors to
mystify the reality and to illustrate the discursive resistance expressed by
residents and residents' associations. We will shed new
light on how conventionalized metaphors are commonly accepted as natural ways
of naming a reality, and therefore function as a powerful device for mystifying
the reality. In contrast, (one-shot)
image metaphors and less conventionalized linguistic metaphors, are not
pervasive in all kinds of discourses, are not natural ways of naming a reality
and can lead to discursive subversion.
DownloadDownload full text of the article as PDF(We recommend the free FoxIt PDF Viewer or Adobe Acrobat Reader 8 for better PDF experience.) ReferencesBoers, F. (1997) When a bodily source domain becomes prominent. In J. Gibbs, and G. Steen (eds.), Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing. pp.47-56. Deignan, A. (2005) Metaphor and Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company. Fairclough, N. (1989) Language and Power. London/New York: Longman. Fairclough, N. (1992) Discourse and Social Change. Cambridge: Polity Press. Fairclough, N. (1995) Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language. London: Longman. Fairclough, N. (2003) Analysing Discourse: Textual Analysis for Social Research. London: Routledge. Gibbs, R. W. (1994) The Poetics of Mind: Figurative Thought, Language and Understanding. New York: Cambridge University Press. Gibbs, R. W. (1999) Researching metaphor. In L. Cameron and G. Low (eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.29-47. Giora, R. and Fein, O. (1999) On understanding familiar and less familiar figurative language. Journal of Pragmatics 31: 1601-1618. Goatly, A. (1997) The Language of Metaphors. New York: Routledge. Kövecses, Z. (2002) Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. Lakoff, G. (1991) Metaphor and war: The metaphor system used to justify war in the Gulf. Peace Research 23: 25-32. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980) Metaphors we Live by. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press. Lakoff, G. and Turner, M. (1989) More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Low, G. (1999) Validating metaphor research projects. In L. Cameron and G. Low (eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.48-65. Low, G. (1988) On teaching metaphor. Applied Linguistics 9: 125-147. Semino, E. (2002) A sturdy baby or a derailing train? Metaphorical representation of the euro in British and Italian newspapers. Text 22: 107-139. Sontag, S. (1989) Illness as Metaphor and AIDS and its Metaphors. Farrar: Strauss & Giroux. Steen, G. (1999) Metaphor and discourse. Towards a linguistic checklist for metaphor analysis. In L. Cameron and G. Low (eds.), Researching and Applying Metaphor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.81-104. ( categories: )
|
AboutCritical Approaches to Discourse Analysis Across Disciplines (CADAAD) is an ongoing project which aims to foster and promote cross-disciplinary communication in critical discourse research. This user-driven site is intended to be a collaborative space providing resources for students and scholars critically involved with discourse.
Upcoming events
Recent blog postsWho's onlineThere are currently 0 users and 1 guest online.
|