Home » eJournal

Lillian (2008) Modality, Persuasion and Manipulation in Canadian Conservative Discourse

Modality, Persuasion and Manipulation in Canadian Conservative Discourse

Donna L. Lillian, East Carolina University

Abstract

Modality as a linguistic device encompasses a variety of forms, including (but not limited to) modal auxiliaries, modal verbs, modal adverbs, and modal adjectives.  The present paper focuses specifically on the use of modal auxiliaries in two political texts.  The first text, Beyond Greed: A Traditional Conservative Confronts Neoconservative Excess, is by Hugh Segal, who might be described as a ‘mainstream' Canadian conservative, and the second, The War Against the Family, is by William D. Gairdner, who represents a far right neoconservative position in Canadian politics.  Fowler (1985) proposes five categories of modality:  validity, predictability, desirability, obligation, and permission.  Following Fowler, I classify the modals in Segal's book of approximately 35,000 words and in a representative 35,000 words segment of Gairdner's book. Not surprisingly, the overwhelming number of clauses in both texts fall into the categories of validity and predictability, which are, to some extent, the default modalities of (quasi) academic non-fiction texts.  Interesting difference arise, however, when one considers the deontic modalities of desirability, permission, and obligation. Using the data obtained through this analysis, I argue that Segal's writing constitutes persuasion, whereas Gairdner's constitutes manipulation.

Download

Download full text of the article as PDF

(We recommend the free FoxIt PDF Viewer or Adobe Acrobat Reader 8 for better PDF experience.)

References

Bliss, R. (2005).  Manipulation in the speeches and writings of Hitler and the NSDAP from a relevance theoretic point of view. In L. de Saussure and P. Schultz (eds), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. pp.169-190. 

Coates, J. (1983).  The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. London: Croom Helm.

Fowler, R. (1985).  Power. In T. A. van Dijk (ed.), Handbook of Discourse Analysis, Vol. 4. London: Academic Press, Inc. pp.61-82.

Gairdner, W. D. (1992).  The War Against the Family. Toronto: Stoddart.

Halliday, M.A.K. (2002a). Modes of meaning and modes of expression: Types of grammatical structure and their determination by different semantic functions (1979). In J. Webster (ed.), On Grammar.  London: Continuum. pp.196-218

Halliday, M.A.K. (2002b) [1981]. Text semantics and clause grammar: How is a text like a clause?  In J. Webster (ed.), On Grammar. London: Continuum.  pp.219-260.

Jespersen, O. (1924). The Philosophy of Grammar. London: Allen & Unwin.

Jowett, G.S. and O'Donnell, V. (2006).  Propaganda and Persuasion (4th edn.). London: Sage.

Lillian, D. L. (1996). Introducing trouble, or the trouble with the trouble with Canada. Papers from the Twentieth Annual Meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association. Fredericton: University of New Brunswick.  pp.95-103.

Lillian, D. L. (1997).  Transitivity as an ideological tool: The discourse of William D. Gairdner. Papers from the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the Atlantic Provinces Linguistic Association. Halifax: Nova Scotia. pp.122-131.

Lillian, D. L. (2005).  Homophobic discourse: A ‘popular' Canadian example. SKY Journal of Linguistics 18: 119-144.

Lillian, D. L. (2007).  A thorn by any other name: Sexist discourse as hate speech. Discourse & Society 18(6): 719-740.

Lillian, D. L. (forthcoming).  Neo-Conservative racist discourse: A Canadian case study. WORD 57(1).

Palmer, F. (1986).  Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Palmer, F. (2001).  Mood and Modality (2nd edn.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Piqué-Angordans, J., Posteguillo, S. and Andreu-Besó, J.V. (2002).  Epistemic and deontic modality: A linguistic indicator of disciplinary variation in academic English. LSP & Professional Communication 2(2): 49-65.

Rigotti, E. (2005).  Toward a typology of manipulative processes.  In L. de Saussure and P. Schultz (eds.), Manipulation and Ideologies in the Twentieth Century: Discourse, Language, Mind. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  pp.61-83. 

Segal, H. (1997).  Beyond Greed: A Traditional Conservative Confronts Neoconservative Excess. Toronto: Stoddart.

Sulkunen, P. and Törrönen, J. (1997). The production of values: The concept of modality in textual discourse analysis. Semiotica 113(1/2): 43-69.

van Dijk, T. A. (2006).  Discourse and manipulation. Discourse & Society 17(3): 359-383.

von Wright, G.H. (1951).  An Essay in Modal Logic. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Co.

( categories: )